I’m Kate Dewhirst.

My team and I write about legal issues affecting healthcare in Canada.

Kate Dewhirst Health Law - bringing the law to life. Meet Kate (in 13 seconds)

Feuding Parents and Privacy Requests: what to do when joint custodial parents disagree

Posted by

In Decision 160, the IPC reviewed a complaint from the father of two children (both under the age of eight) whose records request was partially denied by the hospital where the children received care. The records contained concerns about the father’s relationship with the children. The mother did not consent to the records being disclosed to the father.

The IPC dismissed the complaint.

The father and mother were equally ranked substitute decision-makers for the children under PHIPA. For that reason, the father did not have a right to access the children’s health records over the objection of the children’s mother.

This decision is consistent with other decisions of the IPC.  Where you have joint custodial parents who are equally ranked substitute decision-makers for their children under PHIPA, one parent cannot act independently over the objection of the other in making a request under PHIPA in relation to the children’s personal health information.

The IPC also noted that in light of the mother’s objection, the father did not have the right to complain to the IPC. The authority of the requester is a threshold issue which must be considered before deciding any right of access.

Finally, the IPC confirmed that a custodian faced with a request from a substitute decision-maker need not canvass the views of all equally ranked substitute decision-makers in order to satisfy itself that they all agree to the request. Where the custodian has reason to believe that another equally ranked substitute decision-maker would disagree with the request, the custodian cannot rely on the requestor’s assertion that they are a lawfully authorized decision-maker and would be entitled to refuse the request.

Key takeaway message: when two parents are equally ranked substitute decision-makers for an incapable child, one parent cannot act independently over the objection of another. While there is no obligation on a custodian to canvass with both parents, where there is information to suggest that one parent disagrees (or would disagree if asked), the custodian can no longer rely on the authority of the other parent to disclose information and must get both parents to agree before privacy decisions can be made.

If you enjoyed this article please share it:

Previous and next posts from Kate:

Some of Kate’s recent and upcoming events

Free healthcare privacy webinar - ask me anything!
the first Wednesday of every month

Free webinars - advance registration needed

Whether you're an experienced privacy officer or new in the field, pick Kate’s brain for free for an hour, in this live webinar. No charge, but you’ll need to register in advance.

Health Privacy Officer Foundations training
April 13, 20, 27, May 4, 11, 18, 25 2022 Coming Soon: Fall 2022 Next Program

For Privacy Officers within healthcare organizations.

This course focuses on how to become a more confident privacy officer and gives you the tools to document your privacy program. Full details and registration here...

Join the Shush: a collective of health privacy officers
Annual membership 2022

For Privacy Officers within healthcare organizations

This is an annual membership program that takes theory into practice and tackles real life scenarios to build Privacy Officer skills.
Full details and registration here.

Primary care webinars: Employment Law Update & Legal Issues for EDs and Board members

Part of Kate’s monthly webinar series.

Our May program will address progressive discipline and in June we discuss the key responsibilities Boards need to know in primary care.
Full details of the 2022 webinar series and registration here.

Team Privacy Training Events
May 2, 9, 26, 27

For Primary Care clinics, Hospitals, Community Agencies, Mental Health Teams, Public Health Units, School Boards, Police departments

Kate trains health professionals from many more health care organizations how being privacy-respectful can improve therapeutic relationships. More details...

Ontario Hospital Association Professional Staff Credentialing Toolkit

2nd Edition is now available for managing physicians, dentists, midwives and nurse practitioners in hospitals Read here...

Free summary of all PHIPA IPC decisions

Want to read privacy breach stories to learn how to improve your work? We have summarized all the Information and Privacy Commissioner's health privacy decisions for you Download here...

Kate Dewhirst Health Law

Kate says:

My mission is bringing the law to life. I make legal theory understandable, accessible and fun! I’m available and love to work for all organizations in the healthcare sector across Ontario and beyond.

Subscribe to my mailing list and keep up to date with news:

Latest Tweets

[IPC Decision 178] Correction Requests: Applying the “Professional Opinion/Observation” Exception -- Written by Sar… https://t.co/kgnfDWgpLu

12:00 PM Jun 24th

contact details

P.O. Box 97010 Roncesvalles
Toronto Ontario M6R 3B3

(416) 855 9557