I’m Kate Dewhirst.

I’m a lawyer who writes about legal issues affecting healthcare in Canada

Kate Dewhirst Health Law - bringing the law to life. Meet Kate (in 13 seconds)

3 New Decisions of the IPC – Now 67 Orders and Decisions

Posted by

There are three new decisions of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario under the health privacy legislation.

That brings the total number of Orders and Decisions of the IPC to 67. You can read my summary of all 67 IPC PHIPA Decisions

Bottom Line: There are no surprises here.  All three decisions upheld the decisions of the custodians.  The analysis is consistent with other decisions of the IPC.  In each case, the custodian had appropriately answered the questions and queries of the complainants, but there continued to be a dispute. The IPC dismissed each case.

Decision 65 – Reasonable Search – Hospital

A hospital received a request for access to all records relating to the complainant’s deceased mother. The complainant was the deceased’s estate trustee. The hospital provided a copy of the deceased’s record. The complainant believed additional records should exist. The hospital found additional records that had been inadvertently overlooked and provided those to the complainant. The complainant believed there should be even more records based on a referral from a physician and notes from another physician.

The IPC concluded the hospital conducted a “reasonable search” and dismissed the complaint. The hospital was asked to provide a sworn affidavit by the person who conducted the search outlining the steps they took to locate responsive records.  The IPC was satisfied that the hospital made a reasonable effort to locate additional records and did not find any.

Decision 66 – Correction – Community Health Centre

A community health centre received a correction request to make six changes to the complainant’s health record relating to two visits. After some negotiation, the CHC agreed to make all requested corrections. The complainant had additional concerns and was invited to file a new complaint. The complaint included that the file contained typos and subtle inaccuracies but did not specify what the inaccuracies were or how they related to the decision to grant all the corrections previously itemized.

The IPC declined to conduct a review. The complainant did not provide sufficient detail or clarification about her requests for correction. The IPC found the CHC had already responded to earlier requests. The complainant also refused to provide her consent to the IPC to have access to her personal health information – so the IPC did not have a copy of the records at issue.

Decision 67 – Correction – Local Health Integration Network (formerly CCAC)

A Local Health Integration Network received a 62-part correction request.  The LHIN was formerly a Community Care Access Centre (CCAC). The requests mainly related to a Resident Assessment Instrument Assessment. The LHIN agreed to make two corrections but denied the rest. The LHIN agreed to allow a statement of disagreement to be attached to the record.

The IPC upheld the decision of the LHIN. The IPC concluded that the complainant failed to establish a right of correction for some of the information at issue and that the LHIN rightly denied correcting the other information because that information constituted “good faith professional opinion or observations”.


If you enjoyed this article please share it:


Previous and next posts from Kate:

Some of Kate’s recent and upcoming events

Team Privacy Training Events

February 1, 11, 12, 27, March 21

For Primary Care clinics and FHTs

Kate trains health professionals from many more primary care organizations how being privacy-respectful can improve therapeutic relationships. more details...

Resilience for Lawyers

February 6, 2019

with Sharon Duffy and the Law Society of Ontario

Legal coaching session getting your goals back on track. More details...

Primary care webinars: Discrimination & Privacy Update

February 7 and March 7, 2019, 12 noon

Part of Kate’s monthly webinar series.

Our February webinar is on avoiding claims of discrimination, and in March get an update on the latest privacy issues.

Full details of the 2019 webinar series and registration here.

Privacy Officer training

April 30 through June 4, 2019

Kate’s specialist training course for Privacy Officers in health organizations.

Open to all health Privacy Officers, as well as those hoping to become Privacy Officers. Full details and registration for Privacy Officer training next spring here...

Advanced Privacy Officer training

June 18, 2019

For experienced Privacy Officers within healthcare organisations.

This one day training course focuses on how to handle difficult privacy situations using real-life (but anonymized) case studies and role-play. Full details and registration here...

Free healthcare privacy webinar - ask me anything!

February 6, 2019 9-10am and
March 6, 2019 4-5pm

Free webinar - advance registration needed

Whether you're an experience privacy officer or new in the field, pick Kate’s brain for free for an hour, in this live webinar. No charge, but you’ll need to register in advance.

Kate Dewhirst Health Law

Kate says:

My mission is bringing the law to life. I make legal theory understandable, accessible and fun! I’m available and love to work for all organizations in the healthcare sector across Ontario and beyond.

Subscribe to my mailing list and keep up to date with news:

Latest Tweets

There are three key issues hospitals need to manage when recruiting non-licensed physicians to non-medical roles wi… https://t.co/TDbUnF0cVZ

about 11 hours ago

Sometimes I get the blues. Maybe you do too. I mean how many “growth opportunities” can one person handle? What les… https://t.co/pg3GehSLlh

about 17 hours ago

What does a Privacy Officer do in a health care organization? https://t.co/GP4aTJodKV #healthprivacy #HealthLaw #TorontoLawyer

about 21 hours ago

contact details

901 King Street West Suite 400 East Tower
Toronto Ontario M5V 3H5

(416) 855 9557