I’m Kate Dewhirst.

I’m a lawyer who writes about legal issues affecting healthcare in Canada

Kate Dewhirst Health Law - bringing the law to life. Meet Kate (in 13 seconds)

Health Privacy Update: Complainant does not get 2 kicks at the can

Posted by

In decision 80 of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, the wife of a deceased patient was concerned that a hospital doctor wrongly shared her husband’s health information by speaking to a third party about the care he received and that the hospital failed to meet its privacy obligations.  These concerns were raised with the IPC as well as the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) (which decision of the Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee decision was further appealed to the Health Professions Appeal and Review Board (HPARB)). 

The IPC declined to review the complaint having found it had been adequately addressed in the proceeding by the CPSO and concluded that the hospital took adequate steps to respond to the complaint.

As background, the wife made a complaint about care provided to her husband (the patient) at the hospital. The doctor admitted he asked the patient’s hospital roommate’s wife (the third party) whether she witnessed any nursing care provided to the patient. The doctor said he didn’t share the patient’s name. The patient’s wife complained to the hospital that the doctor’s conversation with the roommate’s wife constituted a privacy breach.

The hospital reviewed the complaint and concluded that there had not been any disclosure of information to a third party. 

The wife of the patient was dissatisfied and complained about the doctor’s actions to the CPSO. The concerns about a potential breach of confidentiality were addressed by the CPSO as well as by the appeal board, HPARB.  The CPSO issued a decision addressing the doctor’s conduct, which was upheld by HPARB.

The wife also complained to the IPC.

The IPC concluded the doctor had disclosed information to the patient’s hospital roommate’s wife and that such disclosure was subject to PHIPA. However, the IPC also concluded that the matter had been adequately addressed by another proceeding through the CPSO and chose not to review the matter again. The IPC concluded it was not necessary to review the complaint because of judicial finality, economy and fairness to the parties. The decision also addresses the legal issue of the IPC taking notice of the proceedings of the CPSO.

Bottom Line:  While this decision focuses on legal process – there are practical takeaways for clinicians.

One of the debates discussed in this case was whether the doctor’s conversation with the patient’s roommate’s wife included personal health information. The doctor never mentioned the patient’s name to the roommate’s wife.  However, the IPC concluded the conversation involved personal health information.  Personal health information is broadly understood and defined.  Just because a name is not mentioned does not remove privacy obligations under PHIPA. 

The hospital in this case was able to demonstrate it provided training and education of its physician members and took the culture of privacy very seriously.  Such evidence obviously went a long way in convincing the IPC the hospital’s conduct was reasonable.   Training is a vital aspect of privacy risk management.  Do not forget to train your physicians in addition to other health professionals!


If you enjoyed this article please share it:


Previous and next posts from Kate:

Some of Kate’s recent and upcoming events

Team Privacy Training Events

September 17, September 24, October 16, October 24 and November 21

For Primary Care clinics, Children’s Aid and FHTs

Kate trains health professionals from many more primary care organizations how being privacy-respectful can improve therapeutic relationships. more details...

Speaking event

October 23, 2019

Osgoode Professional Development – Mental health Certificate

Kate joins the faculty for this training event. More details...

Primary care webinars: Contracts & Communications

September 5 and October 3, 2019, 12 noon

Part of Kate’s monthly webinar series.

Our September webinar is about understanding contracts you may be asked to sign, and in Octber our title is Managing incapacity in the workplace.

Full details of the 2019 webinar series and registration here.

Privacy Officer training

January 20 & 27 and February 3,10 & 18, 2020

Kate is the program chair for the Osgoode Certificate in Privacy in Healthcare.

This program explores the range of privacy interests that must be protected in the day-to-day treatment of patients, the development of information systems and the creation of institutional policies.More details ...

Advanced Privacy Officer training

December 10, 2019

For experienced Privacy Officers within healthcare organisations.

This one day training course focuses on how to handle difficult privacy situations using real-life (but anonymized) case studies and role-play. Full details and registration here...

Free healthcare privacy webinar - ask me anything!

August 7 and September 4, 2019, 10-11am EST

Free webinars - advance registration needed

Whether you're an experience privacy officer or new in the field, pick Kate’s brain for free for an hour, in this live webinar. No charge, but you’ll need to register in advance.

Kate Dewhirst Health Law

Kate says:

My mission is bringing the law to life. I make legal theory understandable, accessible and fun! I’m available and love to work for all organizations in the healthcare sector across Ontario and beyond.

Subscribe to my mailing list and keep up to date with news:

Latest Tweets

The Biggest Mistake Health Teams Make When Receiving Privacy Concerns. Claim your free privacy officer training vid… https://t.co/RKnmq5OdCU

about 19 hours ago

[Starts JAN 20] Globally, healthcare accounted for more privacy breaches than any other industry in 2018.… https://t.co/coT04cQ3E1

12:01 PM Aug 18th

contact details

901 King Street West Suite 400 East Tower
Toronto Ontario M5V 3H5

(416) 855 9557

.