I’m Kate Dewhirst.

I’m a lawyer who writes about legal issues affecting healthcare in Canada

Kate Dewhirst Health Law - bringing the law to life. Meet Kate (in 13 seconds)

Don’t make these 3 mistakes when processing requests for access to health records – New IPC decision 93

Posted by

A patient wants a copy of their health record.

You give them your organization’s form to fill out before you give them a copy.

What are you allowed to ask on that form? If your questions are not all answered, are you allowed to  send back the access request as “incomplete”?

That’s the subject of a new decision of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario (IPC) – Decision 93.

In Decision 93, a patient of a hospital asked for a copy of their record.  The patient complained to the IPC about the fees charged for processing the request. The fee dispute was settled between the hospital and the patient.

What’s fascinating about this decision, is that the IPC goes on to comment on the hospital’s process of rejecting “incomplete” record requests.

The hospital considered patient requests for copies of their health records to be “incomplete” if the request form was not:

  1. Witnessed
  2. Dated within the last 3 months
  3. Directed to the hospital
  4. Inclusive of what information the individual required (including relevant dates of records)
  5. Inclusive of the purpose for the request
  6. Inclusive of the patient’s name, address, signature, date of birth, health care number and other identifying information
  7. Inclusive of the substitute decision-maker’s name and proof of legal authority (if the request was made by the patient’s substitute decision-maker)

The IPC stated that it was inappropriate for the hospital to reject access requests as incomplete on 3 of those elements:

  1. Witnessed: access requests are not required by law to be witnessed by another person
  2. Dated within the last 3 months: the hospital had not explained why it took the position that every access request signed beyond 3 months prior was automatically suspicious and therefore rejected
  3. Inclusive of the purpose for the request: individuals are not required to explain why they want access to their own records – while healthcare organizations are allowed to ask for the purpose (in order to help understand the request for access), they are not allowed to refuse to process the request if a reason for access is not shared

What questions do your access forms ask?

How do you process access requests?

Do you ever send the forms back as “incomplete”?  If yes, read Decision 93 to better understand your obligations to ensure patients have proper access to their own information.

Want to read about PHIPA privacy decisions of the IPC? Click here to get my free up-to-date Summary of all the IPC’s PHIPA Decisions.

If you enjoyed this article please share it:

Previous and next posts from Kate:

Some of Kate’s recent and upcoming events

Team Privacy Training Events
December 11, January 16-17

For Primary Care clinics, Children’s Aid and FHTs

Kate trains health professionals from many more primary care organizations how being privacy-respectful can improve therapeutic relationships. More details...

Speaking event February 4, 2020

Osgoode Professional Development – Health Law Certificate

Kate joins the faculty for this training event. More details...

Primary care webinars: Employment Law Update & Legal Issues for EDs and Board members

Part of Kate’s monthly webinar series.

Our December webinar is an employment law update, and the January program is a legal update for EDs and Board members.
Full details of the 2020 webinar series and registration here.

Advanced Privacy Officer training
December 10, 2019

For experienced Privacy Officers within healthcare organisations.

This one day training course focuses on how to handle difficult privacy situations using real-life (but anonymized) case studies and role-play. Full details and registration here...

Osgoode Health Privacy training
January 20 & 27 and February 3,10 & 18, 2020

Kate is the program chair for the Osgoode Certificate in Privacy in Healthcare.

This program explores the range of privacy interests that must be protected in the day-to-day treatment of patients, the development of information systems and the creation of institutional policies. More details...

Free healthcare privacy webinar - ask me anything!
December 4 (cancelled) but back January 8

Free webinars - advance registration needed

Whether you're an experienced privacy officer or new in the field, pick Kate’s brain for free for an hour, in this live webinar. No charge, but you’ll need to register in advance.

Kate Dewhirst Health Law

Kate says:

My mission is bringing the law to life. I make legal theory understandable, accessible and fun! I’m available and love to work for all organizations in the healthcare sector across Ontario and beyond.

Subscribe to my mailing list and keep up to date with news:

Latest Tweets

What does a Privacy Officer do in a health care organization? https://t.co/tiSvuffz4C #healthprivacy #HealthLaw #TorontoLawyer

about 8 hours ago

[FEB 6] Case study: Family status accomodation Register now - webinars on legal topics for EDs and managers in prim… https://t.co/PJKzTzOFAx

08:01 AM Jan 22nd

contact details

901 King Street West Suite 400 East Tower
Toronto Ontario M5V 3H5

(416) 855 9557