I’m Kate Dewhirst.

I’m a lawyer who writes about legal issues affecting healthcare in Canada

Kate Dewhirst Health Law - bringing the law to life. Meet Kate (in 13 seconds)

Is an access-only parent entitled to their children’s health information?

Posted by

In a new Decision 96 of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario (IPC), a father who had access-only (not custody) of his children wanted a certain information from a health care provider. The health care provider refused to confirm or deny they had information about the children. The father complained to the IPC.

The father argued:

  1. He was entitled to the information as the children’s father
  2. He wanted administrative records only and not records of personal health information when he asked for the dates and times of scheduled appointments, intake documents and information about the intake process (he specifically did not ask for copies of counselling records)
  3. A court order gave him the authority to receive the same information as his ex-wife received about the children from the health care provider.

The IPC made a lot of interesting clarifications:

  1. It would not confirm or deny that the children were receiving services from the health care provider because to do so was potentially their health information
  2. Unlike FIPPA (freedom of information legislation), PHIPA does not give requesters a right of access to general records of a health care provider
  3. The father was not entitled to “access” to any records of personal health information because (a) it wasn’t his information; (b) the children were capable to make their own decisions; (c) the children were over the age of 16; and (d) even if the children were not capable, as the access-only parent, his ex-wife would have been the substitute decision-maker.
  4. The father was really requesting that the health care provider disclose information to him, not grant him access.
  5. The health care provider had a legal obligation to consider the father’s request for disclosure and not ignore it.

Then the IPC said the health care provider had failed to consider its discretion whether to disclose the information to the father on his request and ordered the provider to reconsider based on:

  1. Did they have consent to disclose to the father? Because the children were over the age of 16 and capable, that consent would have to come from the children themselves and not the custodial parent.
  2. Was there a court order or other legal authority compelling them to disclose to the father?
  3. Was there legislation they needed to consider authorizing the father to receive information, such as the Divorce Act or the Children’s Law Reform Act?

You want to know what happened, don’t you?

Me too.

But we don’t know because the IPC ordered the health care provider to “reconsider its decision” to fulfill its obligations to respond to a request for disclosure. The IPC did not tell the health care provider what to do.

We’ll have to wait and see what happens.

 

 


If you enjoyed this article please share it:


Previous and next posts from Kate:

Some of Kate’s recent and upcoming events

Team Privacy Training Events
October 16, October 24 and November 21

For Primary Care clinics, Children’s Aid and FHTs

Kate trains health professionals from many more primary care organizations how being privacy-respectful can improve therapeutic relationships. More details...

Speaking event October 23, 2019

Osgoode Professional Development – Mental health Certificate

Kate joins the faculty for this training event. More details...

Primary care webinars: Managing Incapacity & Consent to Treatment

Part of Kate’s monthly webinar series.

Our October webinar is about managing incapacity, and the November title is Consent to Treatment.
Full details of the 2020 webinar series and registration here.

Advanced Privacy Officer training
December 10, 2019

For experienced Privacy Officers within healthcare organisations.

This one day training course focuses on how to handle difficult privacy situations using real-life (but anonymized) case studies and role-play. Full details and registration here...

Privacy Officer training
January 20 & 27 and February 3,10 & 18, 2020

Kate is the program chair for the Osgoode Certificate in Privacy in Healthcare.

This program explores the range of privacy interests that must be protected in the day-to-day treatment of patients, the development of information systems and the creation of institutional policies. More details...

Free healthcare privacy webinar - ask me anything!
October 2, November 6 and December 4

Free webinars - advance registration needed

Whether you're an experienced privacy officer or new in the field, pick Kate’s brain for free for an hour, in this live webinar. No charge, but you’ll need to register in advance.

Kate Dewhirst Health Law

Kate says:

My mission is bringing the law to life. I make legal theory understandable, accessible and fun! I’m available and love to work for all organizations in the healthcare sector across Ontario and beyond.

Subscribe to my mailing list and keep up to date with news:

Latest Tweets

The main message: A doctor (or any other health information custodian) should never ignore a patient’s access reque… https://t.co/HW8mrFymnC

about 22 hours ago

What happens when someone asks for access to recordings? It depends. Here’s a story about what might happen.… https://t.co/kRnDh5IOo2

12:01 PM Oct 12th

When you have an early warning system you don't hold all those reports until the end of the year. You look for proa… https://t.co/mz22nGp89F

12:01 PM Oct 11th

contact details

901 King Street West Suite 400 East Tower
Toronto Ontario M5V 3H5

(416) 855 9557

.