I’m Kate Dewhirst.

I’m a lawyer who writes about legal issues affecting healthcare in Canada

Kate Dewhirst Health Law - bringing the law to life. Meet Kate (in 13 seconds)

Health Privacy Update: What is a “bad faith” request for access to health records?

Posted by

In a new health privacy decision of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, we find out what needs to be proven to show a patient is making a request for access to health records in “bad faith”.

Decision 87:  Interprets “Bad Faith” Requests

A patient saw a chiropodist at a foot clinic. The patient wanted a copy of his health record and was given “all the notes on file”. The patient thought there should be more records and made a complaint to the IPC.

The foot clinic admitted there was another record of a “biomechanical assessment” but refused to provide a copy to the patient. The clinic concluded the patient was making the request in bad faith because the patient had not paid for the services rendered to him by the clinic. The clinic also concluded the request for access could result in a risk of serious harm.

The IPC ordered the foot clinic to provide the patient with a copy of the record.

This is the first time the provision of a bad faith request under PHIPA has been interpreted by the IPC.

Bad faith has been defined as: “The opposite of “good faith”, generally implying or involving actual or constructive fraud, or a design to mislead or deceive another, or a neglect or refusal to fulfil some duty or other contractual obligation, not prompted by an honest mistake as to one’s rights, but by some interested or sinister motive. … “bad faith” is not simply bad judgement or negligence, but rather it implies the conscious doing of a wrong because of a dishonest negligence in that it contemplates a state of mind affirmatively operating with furtive design or ill will.”

The patient had not paid the clinic. The patient had told the clinic he didn’t intend to actually use the custom orthotics but needed the documentation for a dispute with the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. The clinic alleged the patient intentionally misled them about the purpose of his visit.

The IPC concluded that to find bad faith, the foot clinic had to prove the request for access to the health record was made in bad faith – not that the patient engaged in bad faith activities to receive services. The clinic failed to prove bad faith for the request for a copy of the report.

Neither could the clinic prove there was a risk of serious harm in providing the patient with a copy of the record. The clinic stated that if it released the biomechanical assessment, the patient might give it to an unregulated person who could harm the patient in the delivery of orthotics. The IPC concluded that harm was at best speculative and at worst unlikely.

Bottom Line: A patient’s right of access to their health records is foundational. “Good” patients have the right and “bad” patients have the same right. “Bad” behaviour by a patient (such as not paying their bills) does not equate to a bad faith request for health records.  

Want to read about other decisions of the IPC? Click here to get my free up-to-date Summary of all the IPC’s PHIPA Decisions.

Join me for my next Health Privacy Officer training and become even more confident in your role.


If you enjoyed this article please share it:


Previous and next posts from Kate:

Some of Kate’s recent and upcoming events

Team Privacy Training Events
October 16, October 24 and November 21

For Primary Care clinics, Children’s Aid and FHTs

Kate trains health professionals from many more primary care organizations how being privacy-respectful can improve therapeutic relationships. More details...

Speaking event October 23, 2019

Osgoode Professional Development – Mental health Certificate

Kate joins the faculty for this training event. More details...

Primary care webinars: Managing Incapacity & Consent to Treatment

Part of Kate’s monthly webinar series.

Our October webinar is about managing incapacity, and the November title is Consent to Treatment.
Full details of the 2020 webinar series and registration here.

Advanced Privacy Officer training
December 10, 2019

For experienced Privacy Officers within healthcare organisations.

This one day training course focuses on how to handle difficult privacy situations using real-life (but anonymized) case studies and role-play. Full details and registration here...

Privacy Officer training
January 20 & 27 and February 3,10 & 18, 2020

Kate is the program chair for the Osgoode Certificate in Privacy in Healthcare.

This program explores the range of privacy interests that must be protected in the day-to-day treatment of patients, the development of information systems and the creation of institutional policies. More details...

Free healthcare privacy webinar - ask me anything!
October 2, November 6 and December 4

Free webinars - advance registration needed

Whether you're an experienced privacy officer or new in the field, pick Kate’s brain for free for an hour, in this live webinar. No charge, but you’ll need to register in advance.

Kate Dewhirst Health Law

Kate says:

My mission is bringing the law to life. I make legal theory understandable, accessible and fun! I’m available and love to work for all organizations in the healthcare sector across Ontario and beyond.

Subscribe to my mailing list and keep up to date with news:

Latest Tweets

The main message: A doctor (or any other health information custodian) should never ignore a patient’s access reque… https://t.co/HW8mrFymnC

about 22 hours ago

What happens when someone asks for access to recordings? It depends. Here’s a story about what might happen.… https://t.co/kRnDh5IOo2

12:01 PM Oct 12th

When you have an early warning system you don't hold all those reports until the end of the year. You look for proa… https://t.co/mz22nGp89F

12:01 PM Oct 11th

contact details

901 King Street West Suite 400 East Tower
Toronto Ontario M5V 3H5

(416) 855 9557

.